Vol. 3 No. 4 (2017): International Journal For Research In Mathematics And Statistics
Articles

Diffraction Experiment Rejects Wave Models of Light

John C. Hodge
Retired, 477 Mincey Rd., Franklin, NC, 28734

Published 2017-04-30

Keywords

  • Diffraction,
  • Interference,
  • Young’s experiment,
  • Afshar’s experiment,
  • Newton Interpretation.

How to Cite

Hodge, J. C. (2017). Diffraction Experiment Rejects Wave Models of Light. International Journal For Research In Mathematics And Statistics, 3(4), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.53555/ms.v3i4.233

Abstract

The interpretation of Young’s double slit experiment of diffraction and interference remains controversial. The experiment uses an image resulting from a single slit projected onto a second mask. If the second mask slit is placed at the center of the image, a Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is projected onto the screen. One side of a slit in the minima examined  the result of varying the intensity of the coherent illumination across the slit. One slit of two in the minima examined the result of only one of the double slits being illuminated. The resultant patterns on a screen were photographed and are on the opposite side of center from the illuminated side of the second mask. These observations reject wave models of light and do not reject the Newtonian model of light. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afshar, S.S., 2005, Violation of the principle of Complementarity, and its implications, Proceedings of SPIE 5866 (2005): 229-244. preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701027v1.
  2. Afshar, S.S. et al., 2007, Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality, preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0702188.
  3. Bush, J. W. M., 2015, The new Pilot-Wave theory, Physics Today 68, 8. Newton, I., Opticks based on the 1730 edition (Dover Publications, Inc., New
  4. York, 1952). Jenkins, F. A. and White, H. E., 1957, Fundamentals of Optics, (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, NY, USA).